The Key Points Which Support the Indoctrination Theoryġ. The character watches Anderson die, then crawls toward the primary control panel, but then passes out before reaching it. Shepherd must choose a specific side of his psyche before coming to grips with the true test near the end of the game. It could be said that the remainder of the game is even the subconscious battle that Shepherd has while attempting to fight off the indoctrination. That leaves the character to be vulnerable to indoctrination. Maybe his mind has been weakened by the attack. When Shepherd is hit, within the game, it is clear that the character is left unconscious. Those who loved the ending of the game tend to support the theory that the ending sequence, which happens after Harbinger attacked Shepherd, transitions the remainder of the game to take place within Shepherd’s mind. It is this unconventional ending that led to the development of the indoctrination theory in the first place. It was a very anti-climactic ending that left many feeling unsatisfied. There were still plot holes present in the story. Gamers didn’t need to fight a final boss. Unlike most video games, the third installment of Mass Effect ended in an unusual way. Why the Ending of Mass Effect 3 Supports the Indoctrination Theory Indoctrination was a primary theme in the storyline of Mass Effect and a heavy component of the scripts in the first and second video games.
That would imply that the battle which takes place after the character goes into the Citadel doesn’t actually take place in real-life, but would take place in the mind.
According to the indoctrination theory, the third game of the series suggests that the character was mind-washed at the end of the game. Shepherd is one the primary characters in the Mass Effect video game series.
0 kommentar(er)
